We witness History everyday... Warriors compared to 95' Bulls. Who would of won in a best of 7 series?

[Dario]

[Craig]

There can only be one.. His name is Lord.

But in all seriousness the bulls

[Mighty_Irwin]

i think the warriors could definitely win a few of the first games because the bulls wouldnt be familiar with the shooting game they play

 

mj could also drop 50 every night.. barnes isnt good enough on defense and green wouldnt be quick enough

 

i'll say 4-2 bulls, hard to go against the GOAT

[Maaku]

lol basketball

[Durty Sprite]

Would pay so much money to see this. I should have paid for those nose bleeds to see kobe go off.

[Marko]

lol basketball

[Nice Net]

i think the warriors could definitely win a few of the first games because the bulls wouldnt be familiar with the shooting game they play

mj could also drop 50 every night.. barnes isnt good enough on defense and green wouldnt be quick enough

i'll say 4-2 bulls, hard to go against the GOAT

This^

However, it's hard to say considering the defence back then was so different. Not to mention Rodman was a fucking beast, but at the sametime curry is pretty much unguardable.

Rodman savage tbh

Edited April 15, 2016 by Nice Net

[ell pro]

 

lol basketball

 

[Jake]

 

lol basketball

 

[Mikel]

Bulls no doubt about, Jordan just had this heart to him man. No matter how good you play he will keep upping it untill the rest is history.

[Zero]

bulls 4-1, maybe 4-2

 

cannot see the warriors matching the bulls defensively, not to mention the bulls were much tougher back then so the warriors would be drained

 

harper would make curry work harder than usual all 4 quarters. warriors would have to excel in their pick & roll to get clean shots

[Mikitka]

CHICAGO

[Liam]

Man UTD 4-2, Rashford to score 2 and Mata to score 2. Close call though..

[Fred]

I mean yeah, MM remained dominant for x number of years with 1-20 defence, but I agree that FOE has surpassed them in impressiveness through quality on all levels of gameplay for 11 years. Truly savage.

Edited April 15, 2016 by Fred

[Mighty_Irwin]

Retards ^^^^

@@Nice Net

How sick would rodman vs green be

[Fred]

Retards ^^^^

@@Nice Net

How sick would rodman vs green be

 

Yeah I'd love MM to re-open for the Jagex Cup and fight pures in the final too. Don't think it'd ever happen though.

[Nice Net]

Retards ^^^^@@Nice Net

How sick would rodman vs green be

Yeah for sure dude. Rodman was a fucking animal. But green when he gets going is a beast too.

[Dario]

 

Retards ^^^^@@Nice Net

How sick would rodman vs green be

Yeah for sure dude. Rodman was a fucking animal. But green when he gets going is a beast too.

 

To be honest bro. This video gave me goosebumps all around looking at the resemblance of the two teams...

and how similar they played the game...

However the Bulls passing game was on another level....

 

Steve Kerr being there coach has def a big impact on them being 73-9,

considering he was apart of that great 95'-96' legacy..

 

I'm just happy being from the Bay Area and seeing this happen for us,

now we just need to bring a fucking Super Bowl back home to Oakland !!!!!!!

[Andrew]

tall people 1996 vs short people 2016

[Fi Tim]

Bulls 4-1

[Benny The Leak LMAO]

No question Warriors for me. Even Spurs would beat that Bulls team just because of how much the sport has evolved. Not only has the sport evolved, Athletes in general have improved in every sport, everyone is faster, more accurate, stronger and just more athletic in general.

 

If you want to talk about how good a team was for their time I'd go for Bulls though.

[Coggy]

 

i think the warriors could definitely win a few of the first games because the bulls wouldnt be familiar with the shooting game they play

mj could also drop 50 every night.. barnes isnt good enough on defense and green wouldnt be quick enough

i'll say 4-2 bulls, hard to go against the GOAT

This^

However, it's hard to say considering the defence back then was so different. Not to mention Rodman was a fucking beast, but at the sametime curry is pretty much unguardable.

Rodman savage tbh

 

Yeah that's the thing, you never know how well either team would adjust to playing in the other team's time. 

 

16 Warriors vs 95 Bulls in 95 is completely different than 95 Bulls vs 16 Warriors in 16. 

 

The Warriors back then would have trouble with the style of defence that was allowed, but at the same time the Bulls now would get called for a ton more fouls playing the same defence they always did.

 

Would end up coming down to who ever gets hot that night, Curry or Jordan. 

[Remortality]

bulls