50 or 60 Attack now?

[WellyWood]

Hi people,

 

I'm currently building my pure, I always liked the look of 50 attack accounts but is it worth it now with the g-maul buff? I only really multi PK I don't do a lot of 1v1.

 

Thanks.

[ceZa]

60 or 75 atk

[Utc]

Would recommend 75 so much more variety and shit

[JNI]

60 best build

Edited September 8, 2019 by JNI

[F2p2007]

40-50 won't raise you a cmb lvl after 99 str. 

60 is okay.

[Forced]

if u multi pk bring a dds not a gmaul. Go 60 and when u get bored get 75. GL

[Parm]

60

[W3`]

If you are planning on joining 60 att+, as a side account idk how cost effective the 50% spec attachment is for gmaul yet, but I do like the low cb for rev caves. Will have to make my gmauler members again and try it out.

[I bot alot I]

Im currently building a 50 Attack gmauler and will be maxed at 79 combat. I can definitely see myself getting bored but I like the low cb lvls 

[Some God]

99

[Lonnie]

60

 

Ignore the 75 attack suggestions, I regret getting higher than 60.

 

You cant really take anything, of value, into multi these days...unless you don't mind getting ancient maced.

[John]

75

[WellyWood]

Thanks for the replies boys, think I'll get 60 attack atm.

[ash1337]

75

[RiskAddict]

60

[NiK0]

60 good for wildy and nhing at the start.

 

75 for clanning, gives so many new powerfull weapons.. 

 

[Ollie]

50 is only good for edge so I would say 60 if you are looking to do both clanning and edge

 

75 is really only for clanning in my opinion as it will make your cb too high

[Sneg]

2 hours ago, Ollie said:

50 is only good for edge so I would say 60 if you are looking to do both clanning and edge

 

75 is really only for clanning in my opinion as it will make your cb too high

+1