kazi Posted December 15, 2010 Posted December 15, 2010 Quick find code: 248-249-959-62015859 please refrain from flaming, and please keep bumping it to keep it alive so jagex doesnt make Pures useless
Sam|L A S T Dayz Posted December 15, 2010 Posted December 15, 2010 whats the point? jamflex didnt put the wild back when they took it away. what, honestly, makes you think they are going to change this "revolutionary" update?
kazi Posted December 15, 2010 Author Posted December 15, 2010 because for the wild, they had a replacement for it and it didnt directly effect the WHOLE PURPOSE OF A PURE
Satsot Posted December 15, 2010 Posted December 15, 2010 I too thought this was going to be bad but then, I started to read about it and it's not that bad. Taken from MM Forums: "Soak only affects damage over 200. If you hit 300 and the opponent has a 10% soak (considering the dungeoneering shields have 14%, I find this very unlikely) then it'll soak up 10% of the 100 damage you did over the 200 cap. That's 10. So instead of hitting 300, you hit 290. Hardly the 'end of pures' as you put it. In the end we can sit here crying about the update all day, but Jagex have yet to release any solid information about it. You're not going to gain anything from simply guessing what kind of effects this has in PvP." I think pure, especially the lower level ones, are the pking class that was less affected with this update.
Dravid Posted December 15, 2010 Posted December 15, 2010 honestly this affects no one unless ur like a 90 cb pure.
Ikz Posted December 15, 2010 Posted December 15, 2010 Jesus fuck if I see another one of these topics complaining about something that doesn't affect them at all...
Robyne Posted December 15, 2010 Posted December 15, 2010 I too thought this was going to be bad but then, I started to read about it and it's not that bad. Taken from MM Forums: "Soak only affects damage over 200. If you hit 300 and the opponent has a 10% soak (considering the dungeoneering shields have 14%, I find this very unlikely) then it'll soak up 10% of the 100 damage you did over the 200 cap. That's 10. So instead of hitting 300, you hit 290. Hardly the 'end of pures' as you put it. In the end we can sit here crying about the update all day, but Jagex have yet to release any solid information about it. You're not going to gain anything from simply guessing what kind of effects this has in PvP." I think pure, especially the lower level ones, are the pking class that was less affected with this update. Someone quoted me. I feel so special.
Ep Posted December 15, 2010 Posted December 15, 2010 No! This update owns man My defence level is 66.
Truth Shine Posted December 15, 2010 Posted December 15, 2010 honestly this affects no one unless ur like a 90 cb pure. im lv 87, summoning & def 1, so it affects me alot
Robyne Posted December 15, 2010 Posted December 15, 2010 im lv 87, summoning & def 1, so it affects me alot How exactly is this going to affect you a lot? The only way it's going to affect you is if you're running around with weapons which have high individual hits. Even then I don't see how it's going to change anything. Most pures rely on KOing their opponent. It's very rare that you'll be hitting the exact amount of health they have left, and that's the only way this update is going to have any sort of negative effect on your PvP trips. Unless you're referring to the fact that over the course of an entire fight you'll statistically have hit them for less than you would have before, in which case you should keep in mind that the exact same mechanics which restrict you are affecting your opponent as well. Personally I'd be more interested in Jagex's next attempt to sort out the combat triangle. They said quite explicitly that this is only a small change which is a part of some sort of larger scheme.
Ollie Posted December 15, 2010 Posted December 15, 2010 No No No No No And err, NO NO. They will never update something then remove it just because a few pures made a topic about it. They made it for a reason. Times change; move on or quit. They've always said pures were a 'glitch' in the combat triangle.
Relax Posted December 15, 2010 Posted December 15, 2010 only thing i hate bout the soaking update is how gay the hits look like i still pk the same
aleK Posted December 15, 2010 Posted December 15, 2010 why complain if its knocking off realisticly .10 of a hit? >.>
Shut Up Kid Posted December 16, 2010 Posted December 16, 2010 only thing bad is main clans will be more of a threat
Jesus Posted December 16, 2010 Posted December 16, 2010 I don't like the update but I think your post was very wrongly worded.
RJC Posted December 16, 2010 Posted December 16, 2010 The update barely changed anything so stop crying about it.
Cal Posted December 16, 2010 Posted December 16, 2010 Evidently its a shit update, but its pointless startin a thread like that seeing as when Jagex make up their minds they wont do it, if they gave into pressure we wouldve had the wildy back within hours of it being taken away.. It aint gonna happen sorry
Its zeh noob Posted December 16, 2010 Posted December 16, 2010 because for the wild, they had a replacement for it and it didnt directly effect the WHOLE PURPOSE OF A PURE Isn't the purpose of a pure having the better stats at a lower combat compared to a apponent and thus killing them for easy loot? ^ Removing the wilderness had more of an impact to pures than this update. And they didn't have a replacement right away...
Recking Posted December 17, 2010 Posted December 17, 2010 This is blown out of proportion, if your a main then it may affect u tho
Dravid Posted December 17, 2010 Posted December 17, 2010 update doesnt really affect pures that much...
Phobias Posted December 17, 2010 Posted December 17, 2010 its not that much advantage its like instead of a 40 you will hit a 36 but at dms their will be much of a difrence :S
plex Posted December 17, 2010 Posted December 17, 2010 people dont realize that shit never gets changed through forum topics
Azburn Posted December 18, 2010 Posted December 18, 2010 it only soaks up to 200lp? stop bitching and it wont affect pures under 85 cb
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now