Anonymous: Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?

[d1nn3r]

Go on, whip it out.

gP9q61Fjlqo

[Lat]

The ends justify the means... As long as they use their abilities for "good" then they're alright with me.

[MikeQ]

False dichotomy

[Marc|Criti]

neither, imo most of them are a bunch of self important morons who think they're hardcore by ddosing websites for a few hours.

[Swag]

The term "anonymous" is thrown around way to loosely now, anyone can hit a site offline or hack a website and claim "anonymous" did it. All the planned attacks seem to have a meaning to them and are fighting for something worthwhile so I'd say more Freedom Fighters.

[Anthony]

The term "anonymous" is thrown around way to loosely now, anyone can hit a site offline or hack a website and claim "anonymous" did it. All the planned attacks seem to have a meaning to them and are fighting for something worthwhile so I'd say more Freedom Fighters.

[Marc|Criti]

The term "anonymous" is thrown around way to loosely now, anyone can hit a site offline or hack a website and claim "anonymous" did it. All the planned attacks seem to have a meaning to them and are fighting for something worthwhile so I'd say more Freedom Fighters.

freedom fighters and terrorists are basically the same thing, it depends on the POV lol

[I 4 Def I]

neither, imo most of them are a bunch of self important morons who think they're hardcore by ddosing websites for a few hours.

[Sopuli]

The term "anonymous" is thrown around way to loosely now, anyone can hit a site offline or hack a website and claim "anonymous" did it. All the planned attacks seem to have a meaning to them and are fighting for something worthwhile so I'd say more Freedom Fighters.

This, but also what Marc said, depends on the point of view.

It's not that hard to know what attack is done by so called ''wnb'' anonymous activist, and what done by the real activists. Stratfor just for an example.

[Swag]

The term "anonymous" is thrown around way to loosely now, anyone can hit a site offline or hack a website and claim "anonymous" did it. All the planned attacks seem to have a meaning to them and are fighting for something worthwhile so I'd say more Freedom Fighters.

This, but also what Marc said, depends on the point of view.

It's not that hard to know what attack is done by so called ''wnb'' anonymous activist, and what done by the real activists. Stratfor just for an example.

Well the real ones are generally posted all over twitter by them.

:cute:

[Animal]

The term "anonymous" is thrown around way to loosely now, anyone can hit a site offline or hack a website and claim "anonymous" did it. All the planned attacks seem to have a meaning to them and are fighting for something worthwhile so I'd say more Freedom Fighters.

:hatsoff:

[d1nn3r]

http://twitter.com/youranonnews

http://twitter.com/anonymousirc

http://twitter.com/anonops

But I don't think you can say that there are "wannabe" Anonymous. That would entail there being an "actual" Anonymous. Which there isn't. Anonymous is more like a banner than anyone can take up and support the cause for.