Skrillex Vs. Daft Punk?

[TJ]

Who would you chose?

 

If you could see either one in concert.

 

 

Personally Skrillex. Simply because I find daft punk's music to be too slow.

I need something I can fucking jam too.

[Kman]

daft punk

skrillex is too many stream

[TJ]

daft punk

skrillex is too many stream

and daft punk isnt? lol

[Sean``]

Daft Punk erry day

[Fred]

please die ..

[Luke]

Daft Punk.. Alive 2007, enough said. They way they work their own material to create something new and unique for their live performances is standalone. Don't get me wrong, Skrillex would be fun, but only in the way going to any dubstep show would be fun for me. Daft Punk is special live performance, I find their music is far more memorable in the bigger picture, and I would take more enjoyment out of their show. Still won't forget a couple summers ago when my work schedule kept me from seeing Ratatat, Daft Punk, & Buckethead at different points in Central Park. Regrets man

Edited May 6, 2013 by Luke

[i tauntz i]

a mix with both would be great imo but daft punk is kinda slow yet i can't listen to dubstep for more than  30 mins without getting bored so daft punk

[Creamie pies]

Tj u retard daft punk, Have you even seen or been to one of their tours? They are not like the radio edits or anything. They are insane, skrillex is a sellout 

[TJ]

Tj u retard daft punk, Have you even seen or been to one of their tours? They are not like the radio edits or anything. They are insane, skrillex is a sellout 

Yea I know, I've seen what their performances look like. TRUST. it was a close call. But I'd love to see skrillex live.

 

As far as skrillex being a sell out, daft punk has done and is continuing to do work with kanye, and other artist. As well as Skrillex.

 

Skrillex pull most of his radio casted songs btw.

 

When you have an incredible talent. Why not make a little money off of it. As long as you love what you do, fuck the world.

[Chris]

Netsky pls, neither of the artists you listed are good enough to listen to for over 30 minutes. they have select songs which are good but overall aren't up to the same standard as other artists

[TJ]

Netsky pls, neither of the artists you listed are good enough to listen to for over 30 minutes. they have select songs which are good but overall aren't up to the same standard as other artists

How about Zedd?

[Dog]

Netsky pls, neither of the artists you listed are good enough to listen to for over 30 minutes. they have select songs which are good but overall aren't up to the same standard as other artists

How about Zedd?

[Dominatus]

Daft punk by far LOOOOOOOOOOOL. Skrillex is just some wannabe dubstep, he isn't even dubstep. I don't have any fucking clue why people call skrillex dubstep, the guy even says he isn't dubstep. I know he isn't because there is a difference between dubstep and his music, and also he likes to use the same shit over and over. If you look at most of his songs you will see the same vocal sounds in like every single one of them. The only songs that got him famous were his originals, but that goes for almost every artist. It seems like everyone does the best on the first one, so they can actually get fame and fortune, then they start to lose more and more interest and end up producing 2nd quality music. Take eminem for example, he had really good original songs now his new songs are just about the illuminati and some are just garbage in general.

[Dominatus]

Netsky pls, neither of the artists you listed are good enough to listen to for over 30 minutes. they have select songs which are good but overall aren't up to the same standard as other artists

Also, I agree netsky is probably better than both of the ones listed, but netsky also gets repetitive, at least for me. I like tomorrows another day though, that's one of my hybriding songs (yes I have hybriding songs).

[Veta]

daft punk

[X0]

 

lol

[nate.]

daft punk DUH