syria

[i tauntz i]

your views? 

should we go to war with them?

and who was the chemical attacks from? 

[Bow]

TIME FOR WAR #1017 BRICKSQUAD

[Logic]

TIME FOR WAR #1017 BRICKSQUAD

[k or as i]

If they step the line yes for know it's calm

Edited September 1, 2013 by k or as i

[DeltaPapa]

nah the usa has got this covered.

[Nearly Godz]

Nuke em

[Sean``]

Uk shouldn't go to war with them, our armed forces are limited as it is and as we're just pulling out of Afghanistan it would be stupid.

Although America are our biggest allies and we do usually follow them into war, people are talking about our ties being broken with them if we don't go in with them, which is stupid. They will still be our biggest allies if we go in or not.

Also unlikely that it wasn't Assad who organised the attacks.

[N0 S0UL]

Uk shouldn't go to war with them, our armed forces are limited as it is and as we're just pulling out of Afghanistan it would be stupid.

Although America are our biggest allies and we do usually follow them into war, people are talking about our ties being broken with them if we don't go in with them, which is stupid. They will still be our biggest allies if we go in or not.

Also unlikely that it wasn't Assad who organised the attacks.

Debate over

[Danny]

there shouldnt be much intervention

[i tauntz i]

by us i meant uk or us or any other country tbh 

 

i agree that it would be massively retarded for the uk to enter another war as we just can't afford it for one however using chemical weapons is massively overstepping the line saying that its fine over there is stupid i think that the un should show its evidence before anything happens but if they are found to have used chemical weapons on their own people i agree that something should be done

[Wally1337]

Cute

[Uaex-Ali]

say what..

[I J3r I Pur3]

Nuke em

[Avenge]

Nuke em

[Nilo]

Cute

[Nilo]

ARAB UNIT IN

 

na usa shouldnt do shit

[Andrew]

cant we let the pakis kill themselves for once

[Nilo]

by us i meant uk or us or any other country tbh 

 

i agree that it would be massively retarded for the uk to enter another war as we just can't afford it for one however using chemical weapons is massively overstepping the line saying that its fine over there is stupid i think that the un should show its evidence before anything happens but if they are found to have used chemical weapons on their own people i agree that something should be done

 

This doesn't mean anything lol, Israel used white phosphorus in 2008 and not a single fuck was given. Usa should just back off from the middle east because they have no reason to be there

[Nilo]

cant we let the pakis kill themselves for once

 

theirs a difference between pakis and the middle east

 

this is like comparing whites and europeans

Edited September 1, 2013 by HaxBob

[Nilo]

[GFX]

 

wow interesing and just bomb em

[Sean``]

You can't just bomb a country. You have to have proof the chemical attack happened and proof of who did it, otherwise it breaks international laws.. The reason the UN hasn't acted so far is because Russia and China disagreed with the proposals, as well as the labour party when the UK prime minister brought his proposal among the UK Government.

[Chase]

U.S. will most likely attack them, but idk if we should since it could mean we could also be in a war with China and Russia and idk if we can handle that by ourselves. 

[Animal]

Nuke em

agree

[i tauntz i]

china/russia would not directly go to war with the us as they would only ever end up losing 

 

also the un have not published the results of the tests they have carried out that the reason the labour party refused to do anything yet

 

and just because once before someone used chemical weapons and nothing was said or done about it does not make it ok to use them now and have nothing said or done about it 

 

also i see the us getting involved as always