Jump to content

ill take him back


vans

Recommended Posts

Deflategate is a complete and utter witch hunt. The raw data does not even support an infraction! Only with the contrivance of "calibrating" the END of first half data (but not the beginning) can they assert an infraction occurred in the first place.

Rather than finishing off the analysis about ideal gas law limits, the report conveniently swithes gears to the difference between Patroit vs. Colt footballs.

But the sample size of Colt balls at halftime is only 4. No academic study would last 4 seconds with such a small sample size.

It's more probable than not that the Wells report is a witch hunt.
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members, 0 Anonymous, 0 Guests

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.